The other day I was at the dentist. The tech and I sat talking while Mathias had his teeth cleaned. This was our first time to the practice and she asked a few questions about our family. I talked about how we had seven children and her first response was "you must
home school". Her second was "you must not work outside the home. You couldn't afford to."
The "you must
home school" comment didn't surprise me. Comments like that are common place when you have a large family. Everyone just
assumes that you are Catholic, Mormon, or a
homeschooler if you have a large family. Obviously this isn't always true. We don
home school, but that isn't why we have a large family.
(You can read more about that in this previous post )
Her second comment though, got me thinking about stay-at-home moms. I know several families that have 1 or 2 children where the mom works outside the home - either full or part time. In my mind, they would be the ones who could more easily afford to stay home. A family of 3 or 4 should cost a lot less money than a family of 9, 10 or more. Food bills and clothing bills should be less. Smaller families don't need to be driving full size or extended passenger vans.
Now if this tech was thinking that we couldn't afford to send our children to day care, she may be correct. With most large families, there will be a wider range of children. By the time the younger ones come around, the older ones would be in school. So realistically, a larger family really wouldn't have any more children in day care than a family with fewer children. So this argument really wouldn't work.
So, my question still is how can a family with 7 children afford to have a stay-at-home mom any more than a mom with 1, 2, or 3 children (assuming of course, that their income is similar)? With the way that our society thinks, they cannot. Our culture says that each child needs to have his/her own room, this fabulous new toy, name brand clothes, play this sport, and attend this certain school. Parents have to drive certain types of cars and own homes with so many square feet of space, and so on.
Larger families tend to be more frugal with what they spend. Name brands don't mean as much, and many of the clothes are from a discount or second hand store, hand-me downs from older siblings or church family, or sewn by Mom. Meals tend to be simpler and made from scratch. Vehicles tend to be large vans that aren't traded in after 100,000 miles. Large families also tend to home educate. This is what leads to the first comment the tech made.
I would like to clarify that the above paragraph does not hold just to large families. I know several smaller families that also are very frugal. I have a friend who has a few children and her husband only works odd jobs when they are available. She does some online selling and what they bring home is all their income. She could go out into the work force and probably find a good job, but she has chosen to be frugal and live on what they can to be home all day with her children. What a testimony she has.
So the comment that the tech made should really be applicable to most moms, not just us with large families. Most moms, should they choose, should be able to stay home, and logically those this fewer children should have an easier time of doing so than those moms with more children.
Of course there are always variables. Income, cost of living, and our family's resistance to cultural demands are just a few. Despite those, I do encourage working mothers to examine for yourself why you are working and is there really a way to live on one income.
For those mothers who do stay home with your children, do you grumble and wish for more money and things? Being frugal isn't easy and takes work. Or do you have a heart of thankfulness that you are able to stay home and be a keeper at home?
I am not a stay at home Mom.
I am a God’s worker.
I have a full-time 24/7 career, working for the King of the Universe.
I have work orders.
I am sent.
I am on assignment.